Forum Posts

Thanks, that's what I needed.

GtkGLExt recently changed from using SourceForge CVS to GNOME Git and I'm having trouble getting Ohloh to associate recent commits with my Ohloh account. When I click on "I am this person", Ohloh ... [More] tells me: You already have a position on this project. Ohloh supports only one position per project. Edit the aliases table instead. However, there doesn't appear to be an appropriate modification to the aliases table. (That is, I am only listed once under a single name--there's no alternative name that still identifies me.) [Less]

OpenVRML's svn repository was started with several years of CVS repository data imported using cvs2svn. While cvs2svn does an acceptable job for the most part, there is some squirrelliness. Thanks for looking into this.

Thanks, Robin. The numbers you quote are in line with my own expectation. However, the recount appears to have completed and they aren't reflected there. In fact, the numbers post-recount look pretty ... [More] much the same as before. Any idea what might cause this discrepancy? [Less]

Robin, any chance you could bump OpenVRML for a full recount again? Ohloh still says the ratio of C to C++ is significantly higher than I know it to be; but I'm not sure exactly why that is. ... [More] OpenVRML's repository does have a good chunk of C code from a dependency that I keep in the repo; still, I think there should be about 20% more C++ than C. At the moment, Ohloh thinks the project has more C than C++. :-/ Also, it would be nice to pick up fully Ohcount's awareness of Automake and Autoconf. [Less]

Sure: OpenVRML News

A minor bug, in case no one else has mentioned it: In Ohloh's rendering of registered RSS feeds, "+" characters seem to get omitted.

Has something happened with this? When OpenVRML got bumped a few weeks ago, it was accurately portrayed as being almost entirely C++. But now the code analysis shows 52% C++ and 46% C. What happened ... [More] here? [edited] I forgot when I initially posted this that I have a C library dependency that I've imported into my source tree. So while the numbers still seem a bit off, they're not as surprising as I'd initially thought. [Less]

I see. As long as you're offering, could you bump OpenVRML? Thanks!

So it seems this has been fixed. Thanks! I suppose projects with "C/C++" code now need to be reindexed. Is this being done automatically or on a case-by-case basis?