Yes, Felipe, of course you are free to. Although, your last sentence suggests that in addition to the right you want a reason, and I can't think of what makes you reiterate your opinion over and over now that you've left the project ;-)

I personally must admit that the "wrong" choice of SCM on developers part sometimes prevents me from contributing, but that's about freedom - core developers have one of choice here. You seem to have ... [More] problems with people holding different opinion... And if you really want to solve the problem without introducing new ones, then instead of forcing your opinion upon others do develop git-mtn two-way bridge. [Less]

Felipe: I'm not sure, one of the OE developers created a converter in python. Before he did (or better - before he finished, that was almost a year ago, anyway), I've started to write a two-way ... [More] git-mtn gateway (akin to git-svn) in c++, but never finished it due to the lack of time, it did the mtn to git conversion, though. There's also this 'tailor' anything-to-anything converter, but last time I checked it didn't work quite well for the purpose. And it's entirely wrong point that superior should win. I mean, there are many things that are natural and not following the nature is what makes human. And I think they should support mtn just for the sake of completeness. I doubt they will, though. [Less]

Well, grim, I was skeptical about git once it came to life (yes, I thought whatever Linus makes will be praised regardless of merits), but to tell you the truth, now if I were you, I'd want pidgin to ... [More] move to git instead, like I wanted it for OE, being an OE developer. That said, I still think supporting mtn is a good thing, even if majority doesn't use it. After all, I hate majority even when I belong to it ;-) [Less]

Felipe, look at the dates ;-) But OE is not the only project using mtn. There's also pidgin...

Hi, OE folks, I'd love to see mtn support too. Alternatively - git in OE ;-) (or OE in git?)