OK, this perfectly explain the current behaviour.
I've deleted the Desktop repository: it's an outdated one and we have no value of keeping it.
Thanks Robin for the quick answer ! :)
I've added new subversion repositories to the Plone Internationalization Effort project few days ago. After a while, all commits were successfully imported by ohloh and the Enlistments page tell us
... [More] that everything seems OK.
Then I expected to see the list of all recent contributors in the Contributors page of the project, but only the old ones are displayed.
It looks like ohloh can't merge statistics from repositories of different kind (SVN and CVS in this case). Is this possible ? [Less]
There was a great article published last month on Linux Weekly News called "Who wrote 2.6.20?". This is a little survey about the linux kernel which contain some good ideas regarding code analysis and
... [More] statistics like "Developers with the most changesets", "Developers with the most changed lines" and so on...
I think this could be inspiring for the ohloh team to add some features to code statistics. [Less]
Ok, thanks a lot.
I also had the same issue while working on a script to automate some SVN operations. I don't know if the "auto-accept-certificate" feature is intentionnaly not implemented by SVN
... [More] devs. If not, it could be a good idea to submit them a feature request. [Less]
Hi,
I tried to import PEWIT svn but the download process always fail at the first step. Look at: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4641/enlistments
On the other and, a checkout on my machine is working:
... [More]
[user@local ~]$ svn co https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/pewit/trunk/pmpd
A pmpd/mkinstalldirs
(...)
A pmpd/install-sh
U pmpd
Révision 13297 extraite.
[user@local ~]$
Why this failed ?
By the way, this let me think of a little improvement for ohloh: having a verbosier fail message can help people debug the problem themselves.
Actually I feel powerless and quite annoyed to post such a thread without being able to provide more informations about my problem... Sorry for the noise. :( [Less]
One option that might improve the report for this project would be to import the trunk/ERP5 development line in addition to the erp5/trunk line -- effectively treating these as two separate
... [More] Subversion repositories.
Unfortunately this doesn't work !
I don't understand why but it look like "svn.erp5.org/repos/public/trunk/ERP5" doesn't exist:
[user@local ~]$ svn info https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk
Chemin : trunk
URL : https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk
Racine du dépôt : https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public
UUID du dépôt : 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
Révision : 13297
Type de noeud : répertoire
Auteur de la dernière modification : vincent
Révision de la dernière modification : 13297
Date de la dernière modification: 2007-03-08 19:12:28 +0100 (jeu, 08 mar 2007)
is working but not the following:
[user@local ~]$ svn info https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/trunk/ERP5
https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/trunk/ERP5 : (URL non valide)
Is anyone had a similar issue ? [Less]
Thanks Robin, for your very fast and detailled answer !
With Subversion repositories, Ohloh examines only current development line. If files are moved to or from other branches, Ohloh will not
... [More] see what happens to those files on the branches.
Ok, I understand. This is quite sad, because for SVN, copy and move are quite similar. So if you rename a file (= "move to another name"), ohloh will loose it's history.
One option that might improve the report for this project would be to import the trunk/ERP5 development line in addition to the erp5/trunk line -- effectively treating these as two separate Subversion repositories.
That's a good idea !
Be aware, however, that on Mar 24 2006, it's going to look as if everyone on the project deleted all of their code, and then someone else on the team (yo?) re-added all of that code.
It's not that bad. Mar 24 2006 will just appear as a singularity, nothing else. [Less]
Hi!
First, I would like to congratulate the ohloh team for their work. I think ohloh is a wonderful tool which can deserve the community in multiple ways. Good job !
Then, my problem:
Ohloh just
... [More] finished to calculate statistics of the ERP5 project ( http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4282/analyses/latest ). You can notice the history start in 2006. But when you browse the SVN repository of the project, you can clearly see that the first files where commited during 2002 (example: http://svn.erp5.org/erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/VERSION.txt?view=log ).
Actually it appear that ohloh is not able to parse log data before Mar 24 2006, which is the date when our repository was migrated from CVS to SVN. This can explain the bug.
Now, do you have an idea why our ViewCVS web interface is able to calculate the history and ohloh not ? [Less]