Forum Posts

Showing page 2 of 2
Post Title Author Date Views
No merge of SVN + CSV datas ?

I've added new subversion repositories to the Plone Internationalization Effort project few days ago. After a while, all commits were successfully imported by ohloh and the Enlistments page tell us ... [More] that everything seems OK. Then I expected to see the list of all recent contributors in the Contributors page of the project, but only the old ones are displayed. It looks like ohloh can't merge statistics from repositories of different kind (SVN and CVS in this case). Is this possible ? [Less]

kevin  about 4 years ago 438
Some Statistic Suggestions

There was a great article published last month on Linux Weekly News called "Who wrote 2.6.20?". This is a little survey about the linux kernel which contain some good ideas regarding code analysis and ... [More] statistics like "Developers with the most changesets", "Developers with the most changed lines" and so on... I think this could be inspiring for the ohloh team to add some features to code statistics. [Less]

kevin  about 6 years ago 650
PEWIT svn enlistment failed

Ok, thanks a lot. I also had the same issue while working on a script to automate some SVN operations. I don't know if the "auto-accept-certificate" feature is intentionnaly not implemented by SVN ... [More] devs. If not, it could be a good idea to submit them a feature request. [Less]

kevin  about 6 years ago 884
PEWIT svn enlistment failed

Hi, I tried to import PEWIT svn but the download process always fail at the first step. Look at: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4641/enlistments On the other and, a checkout on my machine is working: ... [More] [user@local ~]$ svn co https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/pewit/trunk/pmpd A pmpd/mkinstalldirs (...) A pmpd/install-sh U pmpd Révision 13297 extraite. [user@local ~]$ Why this failed ? By the way, this let me think of a little improvement for ohloh: having a verbosier fail message can help people debug the problem themselves. Actually I feel powerless and quite annoyed to post such a thread without being able to provide more informations about my problem... Sorry for the noise. :( [Less]

kevin  about 6 years ago 884
Hidden Old History: Bug ?

One option that might improve the report for this project would be to import the trunk/ERP5 development line in addition to the erp5/trunk line -- effectively treating these as two separate Subversion ... [More] repositories. Unfortunately this doesn't work ! I don't understand why but it look like "svn.erp5.org/repos/public/trunk/ERP5" doesn't exist: [user@local ~]$ svn info https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk Chemin : trunk URL : https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk Racine du dépôt : https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public UUID du dépôt : 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de Révision : 13297 Type de noeud : répertoire Auteur de la dernière modification : vincent Révision de la dernière modification : 13297 Date de la dernière modification: 2007-03-08 19:12:28 +0100 (jeu, 08 mar 2007) is working but not the following: [user@local ~]$ svn info https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/trunk/ERP5 https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/trunk/ERP5 : (URL non valide) Is anyone had a similar issue ? [Less]

kevin  about 6 years ago 752
Hidden Old History: Bug ?

Thanks Robin, for your very fast and detailled answer ! With Subversion repositories, Ohloh examines only current development line. If files are moved to or from other branches, Ohloh will not see ... [More] what happens to those files on the branches. Ok, I understand. This is quite sad, because for SVN, copy and move are quite similar. So if you rename a file (= "move to another name"), ohloh will loose it's history. One option that might improve the report for this project would be to import the trunk/ERP5 development line in addition to the erp5/trunk line -- effectively treating these as two separate Subversion repositories. That's a good idea ! Be aware, however, that on Mar 24 2006, it's going to look as if everyone on the project deleted all of their code, and then someone else on the team (yo?) re-added all of that code. It's not that bad. Mar 24 2006 will just appear as a singularity, nothing else. [Less]

kevin  about 6 years ago 752
Hidden Old History: Bug ?

Hi! First, I would like to congratulate the ohloh team for their work. I think ohloh is a wonderful tool which can deserve the community in multiple ways. Good job ! Then, my problem: Ohloh just ... [More] finished to calculate statistics of the ERP5 project ( http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4282/analyses/latest ). You can notice the history start in 2006. But when you browse the SVN repository of the project, you can clearly see that the first files where commited during 2002 (example: http://svn.erp5.org/erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/VERSION.txt?view=log ). Actually it appear that ohloh is not able to parse log data before Mar 24 2006, which is the date when our repository was migrated from CVS to SVN. This can explain the bug. Now, do you have an idea why our ViewCVS web interface is able to calculate the history and ohloh not ? [Less]

kevin  about 6 years ago 752
 

Creative Commons License Copyright © 2013 Black Duck Software, Inc. and its contributors, Some Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise marked, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License . Ohloh ® and the Ohloh logo are trademarks of Black Duck Software, Inc. in the United States and/or other jurisdictions. All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders.