Hi Andy, I see. Yes, it works now. Thanks for quick fix!

Hi, Yesterday, I added new project (Generic Geometry Library - GGL) which currently lives in Sandbox in SVN of Boost Libraries. I added enlistment that points to GGL module: ... [More] https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/ggl/ Today, I discovered that no code analysis has been made, instead I got the message: "This project is enlisted in a boost.org repository." Does it mean that it is not possible to add GGL SVN repository if it lives in a repository (tree) already added in another project? -- Mateusz Loskot [Less]

Robin, Thank you very much again! Everything works now. I'll be patient next time and I'm not going to bother you about similar issues :-) Cheers, Mateusz

Robin I'm sorry but I need to continue the thread bringing similar problem for another project. I've just added Sxxtl to the Ohloh with SVN repo at the SourceForge.net and there is similar problem ... [More] with downloading sources: Step 1 of 3: Downloading source code history (Failed) The SVN is accessible and loads to my Web browser: http://stxxl.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/stxxl/trunk/ Thanks in advance for any help. -- Mateusz Loskot [Less]

Robin, Everything works well now and the cxxtl project has been imported. Thank you very much! Mateusz

Hi, Yesterday I added new project cxxtl (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/11396) to the Ohloh.net. Unfortunately, there seems to be problem with downloading source coud from the cxxtl SVN repo. I ... [More] followed the suggestion and have been waiting. Next, I found in the FAQ that if such problems remain for 1-2 days, it's a good idea to drop a note (but where, probably here I suppose :-)) Could anyone form the Ohloh staff check what's the problem with SF.net SVN? I tried to checkout using svn client and everything works well for me, perhaps there is a problem with SF.net, I'm not sure. I'd be thankful for your support. -- Mateusz Loskot [Less]

Hi Robin, Thank you for the confirmation. Now, everything is clear to me. Regards

Hi, Recently, I've added libLAS project (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/10742) to the Ohloh.net. Everything works great except surprising analysis of programming language in which the libLAS is ... [More] written. The libLAS is C++ library but the analysis (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/10742/analyses/latest) says it's written in: shell script - 86 % C/C++ - 14 % I'd be thankful if someone could explain me this result. Perhaps long autoconf scripts like ./configure, etc. are measured and ranked higher than the core sources. Is this correct? Regards, Mateusz Loskot [Less]