There was some talk about a new native subversion adapter that ought to be capable of doing this. What's the status on that? Losing years of commit history info isn't fun :(

Currently you have to edit a stack, remove the project and add it back to another stack. It would be nice if there were an quicker/easier way to rearrange your stacks. For example, next to 'remove ... [More] from stack', you could add a 'move to stack' dropdown. [Less]

For subversion projects, a simple way to accomplish this is making the path that should be excluded into an svn external. Ohloh does not check out svn externals. This external does not have to live ... [More] on some other server, you could just store it in a "3rdparty" directory just below root, ie at the same level where "trunk" is so that it does not get pulled in when trunk is pulled in. When developers make a checkout, they'll just get the sources like before. An added advantage is that you could make the path readonly for developers, and only writable for the automated user that builds the JavaDoc, to prevent people from accidentally checking in modified docs. [Less]

I'd like to have a default image for Chicken Scheme eggs (extension libraries). I think the generic egg image used in the Chicken eggdoc output is a good choice. The "plug" icon is starting to look ... [More] boring already (lots of projects using it), so just use the egg on its own :) [Less]

A simple, low impact fix (hopefully, but I don't know your code or server farm structure) that would probably make most people happy would be a way to add an enlistment at a revision. That way, you ... [More] could create an enlistment of limesurvey@TRUNK and phpsurveyor@1234. The history parser should probably be able to backtrack from 1234 back in time to revision 0. [Less]

The missing highlighting confused me at first. I simply thought I had forgotten to add a particular project to my stack. Then I clicked and I saw that it was already there. The wording of it ("I use ... [More] this") implies you don't use it yet, which is incorrect if you already have it in one of your stacks. That said, the multi stack feature is great. I was wondering about if it was possible when I joined and the very next day it was added as a new feature! Cool stuff. [Less]