Forum Posts

The update of the "trunk" enlistment of the Padre project failed. There's not mention of a reason. Robin considered adding better failure reports a while ago. What happened to that?

As a template for the enlistment of a new project, I copied the repository URL of another project in the same repository. Unfortunately, I was too quick in finalizing the enlistment and forgot to ... [More] change the last part of the URL. Afterwards, I tried to delete the wrong enlistment, but it didn't work. I get the JavaScript popup asking for confirmation and then, I get served an XML document (see below) claiming success. But the enlistment won't go away. You can find the problematic page at http://www.ohloh.net/projects/autoxs/enlistments The XML I get served is attached below (slightly mangled, sorry.) Anyone? Cheers, Steffen {response} {status} success{/status} {result} {enlistment} {id}24001{/id} {projectid}13139{/projectid} {repositoryid}19781{/repositoryid} {repository} {id}19781{/id} {type}SvnRepository{/type} {url}http://svn.ali.as/cpan/trunk/Algorithm-CurveFit{/url} {username/} {password/} {loggedat}2008-04-01T21:26:46Z{/loggedat} {commits}1{/commits} {ohlohjobstatus}success{/ohlohjobstatus} {/repository} {/enlistment} {/result} {/response} [Less]

Personally, I think it makes sense to count LaTeX, but is it source code or comment? As you say, it's usually used for documentation, but in principle, it's a programming language. (As are plain TeX and postscript.) Cheers, Steffen

I was shocked when ohloh told me the percentage of comments was below ten percent. And I thought I wrote rather too many comments than too little. Turns out I favour putting them in POD sections if they're longer. So +1 from me!