IRC vs Jabber Chat Groups

Avatar
written by Jason Allen
mar 25 2008
 

Someone joined our spanking new IRC channel last night (#ohloh on irc.freenode.net) and alerted me to jabber chat groups. They offer similar functionality to IRC: you can reserve a 'well-known group name' (for example: ohloh@conference.jabber.org) and offers basic moderator controls.

The benefit, to me at least, is that this integrates much better with IM clients. Not that I mind IRC that much, but I've got to admit that I don't enjoy the esoteric commands and bots very much.

In any case, we'll officially stick with IRC for now - it's way more popular. Secretly, I'll keep rooting for jabber chat groups to take off.

Comments (6) Subscribe to IRC vs Jabber Chat Groups

Avatar

ianp

about 1 year ago

+1 for Jabber.


Avatar

Tobias Schlitt

about 1 year ago

+1 for IRC. I even use Bitlbee to map my IM connections to my IRC client. In general I have the feeling that IRC is more etsablished and accepted in the OS world. Just my .02.


Avatar

Jason

about 1 year ago

You can always get a Jabber room and drop in a relay to bridge the two.


Avatar

Pavel Vyazovoi

about 1 year ago

+1 for jabber


Avatar

David Smith

about 1 year ago

There's a summer of code project on the XSF idea list to make irc channels transparently bridgeable to jabber rooms. Seems like it would solve this nicely :)

(there are existing solutions, as Jason mentioned, but my understanding is that they're a little clunky. I could very well be wrong though, worth checking out!)


Avatar

Valessio S Brito

about 1 year ago

the project inkscape using bridge jirc, view:

http://outflux.net/software/pkgs/jirc-bridge/

http://outflux.net/blog/archives/2006/07/30/jabber-to-irc-bridge/

=]