Code Analysis of Arch Linux and Arch Linux Packages projects shows pretty high usage of D language but I'm pretty sure we don't have a single line of D code anywhere.
Code Analysis of Arch Linux and Arch Linux Packages projects shows pretty high usage of D language but I'm pretty sure we don't have a single line of D code anywhere.
Hi Roman,
It looks like there are some files in these projects with names like 'conf.d', which our parser is misinterpreting as D files.
I have opened a ticket for this fix. Let us know if you have some ideas about how to correctly differentiate these files from D.
Thanks, Robin
Actually conf.d is always directory. So it should be easy to differentiate it from D source files.
Ah, got it. These are files that are going to be in conf.d but are renamed to avoid conflict with other similarly named files (usually files that go in conf.d and rc.d have same name). Yeah, this looks tricky to distinguish... We could rename our files, but that would take very long time because there are many such packages and not all of them are frequently updated.