The award-winning Web browser is now faster, more secure, and fully customizable to your online life. With more than 15,000 improvements, Firefox 3 is faster, safer and smarter than ever before.

If you stack this project, you should also stack the Mozilla Core.

Journal Entries

Avatar

firefox amin_hjz — about 1 month ago

Avatar

Wow! I just found, in the firefox build tree, an object file that not only messes up cowstats (from ruby-elf) but also makes binutils's readelf segfault! Flameeyes — 9 months ago

Avatar

Habe jetzt SamePlace in meinem Firefox installiert, so dass ich direkt die Journaleinträge darüber verfassen kann. djassi — 12 months ago

Avatar

testing it out, but still not sold on the awesome bar.... jason — 12 months ago

Avatar

asicms hat eine neue Klassenverbindung zu FirePHP erhalten. Dadurch ist es jetzt möglich, direkt in Firefox die Aktivitäten zu debuggen. Auch wurde das zwar schnelle, aber unsichere debuggen per URL-Parameter deaktiviert. djassi — 12 months ago

See All Journal Entries


Ratings & Reviews

Community Rating
4.5/5.0

Based on 1801 user ratings.

Your Rating

Click to rate this project.

about 1 year ago Avatar
Firefox 3 a great improvement!

  by irrdev

While Firefox 3 may not include many new user interface features, it appears that Mozilla has finally fixed Firefox's many memory leaks and resource management. Not only is the browser considerably faster at loading, the rendering speed of Ajax-heavy pages, or Web 2.0 websites, is likewise 2-3 times faster. I also really like the improved GTK theme integration on Linux. This latest release is definitely worth checking out, and offers a considerable backend improvement over Firefox 2.

5 of 5 users found the following review helpful. Was this review helpful to you? |

over 2 years ago Avatar
Good, but somewhat tired

    by TheAlienist

I use Firefox 2.01 on a Mac. The whole tabbed browsing features was great 2 years ago, but all browsers do that now. So what's so great about firefox now? Plugins. If you're a web developer there's really no other way to go.

As for complaints, it's slow and a resource hog. I know it's better on Windows, but on a Mac both Safari and Opera feel much faster.

Don't get me wrong - there's not that much to complain about. I just wish they would evolve web browsing beyond tabs and plugins.

15 of 28 users found the following review helpful. Was this review helpful to you? |

Links

4 links submitted so far. Submit your own links.

News

Edit RSS feeds.

    Planet Mozilla Blog: Planet Addition: Dan Witte

    Dan Witte (feed) - Dan joins Mozilla after finishing a Ph.D at Stanford University. He works on static analysis for the browser platform, and is based in the Mountain View office.

    QMO Events: Testday: Fennec 1.0 Beta

    Join the MozQA Community in testing Fennec 1.0 beta!
    ==============================================================
    Fennec is getting very close to releasing a 1.0 version and we need your help to make sure it works as good as ... [More] Firefox.
    This test day is used to browse the web with Fennec and give feedback. We have a test plan outlining some browsing suggestions and guidelines of what to look for: Fennec WebCompatibility If you've never heard of Fennec, information on it can be found here.
     
    Otherwise, we hope to see you there!
    ==============================================================
     
    Here's some of the things we're planning on doing throughout the day:
     

    Test Fennec by browsing various websites that you do on a daily basis
    Use the brand new interface and give feedback on what works and how usable it is
    Learn about ways to help out in future releases
    Tell the Fennec team what you think about your experience.
    For any bugs filed at this testday, add "[fennectestday]" to the bug's whiteboard. If you're unsure what that means, ask a moderator in the channel. [Less]

    Jeff Walden: Quote of the day

    It’s Independence Day, so what better topic to discuss than the juridical matters of the United States? (Frankly, there are more substantive topics to address, to be sure — as a palliative I direct your attention [yet again!] to the Federalist ... [More] Papers for one such topic — but a dash of humor with underlying substance is never out of order.) Here follows a brief anecdote I ran across recently:

    In Gilchrist v. O’Keefe, 260 F.3d 87 (2001), Sotomayor wrote for the panel, which rejected an inmate’s claim that he was unconstitutionally deprived of his right to counsel during his state sentencing proceeding when the trial judge declined to appoint a new attorney to replace the attorney who withdrew after the inmate punched him in the head.

    See the original source, as well as the decision itself.

    It is worth highlighting that the fact that the deprivation occurred during “state sentencing” is critical to the opinion, as 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) (the relevant clause in US code) prevents granting relief in response to a state proceeding, assuming the decision was not “contrary to clearly established Federal law” (which, the decision notes, it was not). As a consequence the decision need not (and does not) reach any question along the most obvious line suggested by the quote, at least not outside of dicta (with which, tangentially, I am not particularly inclined to disagree) — an example of how legal decisions need not be as obvious as they seem, and an example of how common sense may play little to no part in the legal reasoning of a “common-sense ruling”. [Less]

    Firebug Blog: 1.4: you have to manually reload the first time

    Based on newsgroup postings, users did not get the news that Firebug 1.4 requires a manual reload the first time you open it on a site. Ok, no I don’t know how they would know. So here it is:

    In 1.4, when you open Firebug on a page it does ... [More] not automatically reload the page. You have to do it manually.

    In 1.3, the page was reloaded for you. We made this change because some users (ok it was Steve , complained that the reload was not always necessary and sometimes wastes time. This is especially true for users who are primarily interested in HTML and CSS or for users who want to know just when the reload is triggered so they can watch how the page loads.

    But why do we need to reload at all? Well to track net traffic, to track script loading, and to listen for console logging we have to add listeners on the page before the page load begins.   If Firebug is not active at the time of page load, none of this happens. So after you open Firebug you have to reload to get all the info. That was true in 1.3 and it still true in 1.4. The only change here is that 1.4 you have to do it manually.

    By now my brain automatically hits reload when I open Firebug, since I always want all the info on all the panels

    jjb

    Please post follows to the newsgroup. [Less]

    Michael Erlewine: Presenting in Boston at SIGIR Workshop

    I have been accepted to present a short paper entitled “Ubiquity: Designing a Multilingual Natural Language Interface” at the ACM SIGIR Workshop on Information Access in a Multilingual World in Boston on July 23rd. I’ll probably be there in ... [More] Boston a few days before or after as well in order to find an apartment for the fall. If anyone is in Boston at that time and would like to meet up, or if you’re near Cambridge and looking for an apartment-mate, please let me know.

    If you would like to see a preprint of the paper, please contact me at x@x.com where x=mitcho.

    Related Posts
    No related posts.

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. [Less]

Read all Mozilla Firefox articles…

Download Page
1568 downloads

Who uses Mozilla Firefox?

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar

Who contributes to Mozilla Firefox?

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar
I'm a contributor

Who manages Mozilla Firefox?

Avatar
I'm a manager

Where in the world?




People who use Mozilla Firefox also use:


Project Cost

This calculator estimates how much it would cost to hire a team to write this project from scratch. More »
Include
Codebase 63,690
Effort (est.) 15 Person Years
Avg. Salary $ year
$ 838,469