<p><a href="/accounts/Omnifarious">Omnifarious</a> says: Wow, getaddrinfo from <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/glibc'>glibc</a> is broken, but it seems the OS X one is even worse. Someone (maybe me) needs to write a test suite. </p><p>tags: <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/glibc">GNU C Library</a></p>
<p><a href="/accounts/Flameeyes">Flameeyes</a> says: Unmerging everything from my <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/gentoo'>gentoo</a> tinderbox chroot so I can test it with <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/glibc'>glibc</a> 2.9 </p><p>tags: <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo">Gentoo Linux</a>,<a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/glibc">GNU C Library</a></p>
<p><a href="/accounts/Flameeyes">Flameeyes</a> says: How can project still introduce build failures with <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/glibc'>glibc</a> 2.8? </p><p>tags: <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/glibc">GNU C Library</a></p>
<p><a href="/accounts/Flameeyes">Flameeyes</a> says: With all due respect, <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/Glib'>Glib</a> developers&apos; idea of just allowing inclusion of &lt;glib.h&gt; is totally crazy. It&apos;s also going against what <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/glibc'>glibc</a> and <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/gcc'>gcc</a> have been doing with the most recent releases (reducing the size of headers included)... </p><p>tags: <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/glib">Glib</a>,<a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/glibc">GNU C Library</a>,<a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/gcc">GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection</a></p>
<p><a href="/accounts/Flameeyes">Flameeyes</a> says: Running a world rebuild to make sure that <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/gentoo'>gentoo</a> users don&apos;t get bitten by <a href='http://www.ohloh.net/projects/glibc'>glibc</a> update, not too much at least.</p><p>tags: <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo">Gentoo Linux</a>,<a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/glibc">GNU C Library</a></p>