Hudson

Hudson is simple and efficient

  by Gaël Marziou

I have used several continuous integration systems over last 7 years for building J2EE applications: Cruise Control, AntHill OS, AntHill pro 2.6 and 3.
I gave up on AntHill pro 3 because it was too complex to setup and developers did not like the busy UI.
Hudson on the contrary is very easy to setup and uses only XML configuration files instead of a database which is always a problem for backups and exports.
My Hudson configuration is ... [More] under change control in Subversion.
Hudson 's UI is very easy to use and developers find their way very quickly.
My team current configuration is based on Hudson on top of Tomcat using ant, Subversion and ViewSVN. We plan to migrate to Maven which is also supported by Hudson.
There's no real manual only a wiki for starting up and then the online help is usually enough. If you need help, the mailing list is very helpful and the author Kohsuke Kawaguchi is very responsive and also very fast to fix issues. [Less]

4 of 4 users found the following review helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes | No