Forum Posts

Could an admin take a quick gander at http://www.ohloh.net/projects/7972/analyses/latest for me please. It says it's updated 8 hours ago (and I checked, the repo url is good and has 3 revisions in ... [More] it) but the enlistments page says it hasn't finished the anaylsis yet. I'd guess something might have gone wrong, though I haven't got a clue what lol. [Less]

Search for a person in the SCM commit entries.

That's be quite good... would be another project thumbs up badge for if it's code contained a reasonable amount of doxygen/similar commenting, though that might take a little longer to implement ... [More] scratch head Oh, another one! While we're on the subject of per language... wouldn't the ohloh parser have a reasonably easy way to spit out this info (comments, blanks, language composition, etc) on individual commits? Could be useful to be able to look at a graph showing how much a paticular language has been changed in the last X time frame... for, say, the html documentation or what ever? As an extension to that... it would be interesting to be able to tell at a glance that 90% of the lines in the commits over the last month have consisted of adding blank lines and comments. [Less]

Hi Robin, Thank you for your help. We have 2 branches (BRANCH-1-9 and HEAD) at the moment. We had other branches (ex.: BRANCH-1-8) before but they are all deprecated. Missing commits seem to be on ... [More] BRANCH-1-9 Here is an example of a commit to BRANCH-1-9 in August 2006 cvs view diff: http://tikiwiki.cvs.sourceforge.net/tikiwiki/tiki/templates/tiki-calendar.tpl?r1=1.46.2.64&r2=1.46.2.65 cvs monitor: http://cvs.tikiwiki.org/cvsmonitor.pl?cmd=viewBrowseVersion&version=1.46.2.65&file=templates/tiki-calendar.tpl&module=Tiki.Tiki cvs mailing list http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?threadname=E1GH7HC-000352-3z%40mail.sourceforge.net&forumname=tikiwiki-cvs Best regards, M ;-) [Less]

On the stack licenses page, there is a list of projects grouped by their license sets - except it isn't collating them very well! See mine, for example: James Ross's Stack There are 4 separate ... [More] groups for MPL 1.1 + GPL + LGPL! My suggestion is that - at least when aggregating internally - the list of licenses is sorted before comparing. The display can be any order as far as I'm concerned, although sorting alphabetically might be most pleasing. [Less]

Ignore that... I retried and it has now been tracked. Sorry... Kick a** site btw.

Hi there, I've enlisted an older project (2002-2003), but my commiter name is not recognize by the "add experience" tool, even though the commiter is indeed in the CVS history. Is that scan process ... [More] limited to a certain timespan? CVS can br browsed on SourceForge at http://netjuke.cvs.sourceforge.net/netjuke/ Was enlisted through :pserver:anonymous:@netjuke.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/netjuke Committer is epsi, as shown in http://netjuke.cvs.sourceforge.net/netjuke/netjuke/index.php?view=log (see bottom) Any idea? [Less]

I guess it was a temporary failure due to committing activity. Please have another go -- if the next try fails, i'll forward this to the maintainers. Thanks,

It's a project a friend of mine contributes to -- I'll drop him a line, thanks

Interesting, Daniel. On a related note, I think I already suggested somewhere that the Ohloh parser may try to distinguish between structured comments (machine-readable documentation à la phpdoc) and ... [More] raw comments. Structured comments allow detailed code documentation to be generated from the source and are understood by some editors for edit support and autocompletion (e.g. Eclipse plugins). The percentage of structure comments (if any) per project would be a very interesting metric IMO. [Less]