Subversion has rapidly become the version control standard and it is rapidly replacing open source and commercial solutions around the world.
Subversion enables globally distributed software development teams to efficiently version and share source code. The open source Subversion project was started in early 2000 by CollabNet, the primary corporate sponsor of Subversion.

Key Capabilities:
- Versioned directories
- Atomic commits
- Efficient handling of binary files
- Quick branching and tagging
- Directory and file meta data
- Natively client-server
- Minimal server and network requirements
- Low admin overhead
- Good security

more at: http://subversion.tigris.org/

Read Submerged, a blog about Subversion at http://blogs.open.collab.net/svn


Ratings & Reviews

Community Rating
4.4/5.0

Based on 451 user ratings.

Your Rating

Click to rate this project.

about 1 year ago Avatar
Why are you still using CVS?

    by GrumpyOldMan

Subversion is what CVS should have been. It's no mystery that projects are moving en masse from CVS to Subversion.

Subversion follows the same client/server model as CVS, but is a strictly better implementation. Subversion's command line tools will feel familiar to anyone comfortable with CVS, and most of the clever accessories like Tortoise and online code browers are available for Subversion. It's worth making the switch for the ... [More] elegant, efficient branching and tagging alone.

All this being said, I think the client/server source control model is on the way out. I highly recommend taking a look at Git or Darcs, which use a decentralized model that doesn't require a central server. [Less]

23 of 31 users found the following review helpful. Was this review helpful to you? |

4 months ago Avatar
Why are you still using Subversion?

    by mugwump

The design roots of Subversion can be traced back to the first very simplistic attempts at version control, such as SCCS and RCS. The design of it has steamrolled on from the 70's with little consideration of stable internet development methods practiced since at least the mid-eighties.

The claim is made that Subversion "just fixes CVS". And while Subversion is generally more robust and versatile than CVS, some still see it as a step ... [More] towards Rick Astley.

SVN might give you up, tell a lie and hurt you, but Rick Astley won't. He'll never run your revisions around and drop your repository.

OH YEAH! You sure don't wanna let your users down ... don't ever say goodbye to potential contributors because of crappy repository software. Use Bazaar, Mercurial, Git, heck even darcs... but never make your users cry, just say goodbye to Subversion.

(for the pre-rick-rolling version of this review, see http://vilain.net/index.php?q=node/52)

[Less]

35 of 60 users found the following review helpful. Was this review helpful to you? |

Links

6 links submitted so far. Submit your own links.

News

Edit RSS feeds.

    Subversion 1.5 merge-tracking in a nutshell

    As I’ve mentioned in other posts, the Subversion project is on the verge
    of releasing version 1.5, a culmination of nearly two years of work. The
    release is jam-packed with some huge new features, but the one everyone’s
    excited about ... [More] is “merge tracking”.

    Merge-tracking is when your version control system keeps track of how
    lines of development (branches) diverge and re-form together.
    Historically, open source tools such as CVS and Subversion haven’t done
    this at all; they’ve relied on “advanced” users carefully examining
    history and typing arcane commands with just the right arguments.
    Branching and merging is possible, but it sure ain’t easy. Of course,
    distributed version control systems have now started to remove the fear
    and paranoia around branching and merging—they’re actually designed
    around merging as a core competency. While Subversion 1.5 doesn’t make it
    merging as easy as a system like Git or Mercurial, it certainly solves
    common points of pain. As a famous quote goes, “it makes easy things
    easy, and hard things possible.” Subversion is now beginning to match
    features in larger, commercial tools such as Clearcase and Perforce.

    My collaborators and I are gearing up to release a 2nd Edition of the
    free online Subversion book soon (and you should be able to buy it from
    O’Reilly in hardcopy this summer.) If you want gritty details about how
    merging works, you can glance over Chapter 4 right now, but I thought a
    “nutshell” summary would make a great short blog post, just to show
    people how easy the common case now is.

    1. Make a branch for your experimental work:

    $ svn cp trunkURL branchURL
    $ svn switch branchURL

    2. Work on the branch for a while:

    # ...edit files
    $ svn commit
    # ...edit files
    $ svn commit

    3. Sync your branch with the trunk, so it doesn’t fall behind:

    $ svn merge trunkURL
    --- Merging r3452 through r3580 into '.':
    U button.c
    U integer.c
    ...

    $ svn commit

    4. Repeat the prior two steps until you’re done coding.

    5. Merge your branch back into the trunk:

    $ svn switch trunkURL
    $ svn merge --reintegrate branchURL
    --- Merging differences between repository URLs into '.':
    U button.c
    U integer.c
    ...

    $ svn commit

    6. Go have a beer, and live in fear of feature branches no more.

    Notice how I never had to type a single revision number in my example:
    Subversion 1.5 knows when the branch was created, which changes need to
    be synced from branch to trunk, and which changes need to be merged back
    into the trunk when I’m done. It’s all magic now. This is how it should
    have been in the first place. :-)

    Subversion 1.5 isn’t officially released yet, but we’re looking for
    people to test one of our final release candidate source tarballs.
    CollabNet has also created some nice binary packages for testing, as part
    of their early adopter program. Try it out and report any bugs! [Less]

    TortoiseSVN 1.5.0-RC2 released

    We've created the second release candidate of the upcoming 1.5.0 release.
    We like to have as many people as possible to give this release candidate
    a test and report back any bugs you find.

    Note:

    read more

    Subversion 1.5 RC5

    Earlier this week, the Subversion community issued an RC5 release with
    the latest round of fixes. As we have done with previous releases,
    CollabNet is providing binaries for Windows, Linux, OSX and Solaris. The
    CollabNet Merge client and ... [More] Subclipse have both been updated as well.

    Here is a list of some of the noteworthy fixes I see (in order they were
    backported):

    * r30741
    Fix bug whereby 'svn status --depth=files' still showed some dirs.

    * r30743, r30751
    Fix memory leak in recursive remote propget.

    * r30776, r30777, r30779
    svndumpfilter drops mergeinfo when it is *not* run with
    --renumber-revs.

    * r30666, r30684, r30726
    Fix for issue 3181. Compare repository UUID with working copy when
    opening RA session

    * r30761, r30762
    Fix for issue 3172. 'log -g' fails the moment it encounters a bogus
    mergeinfo which claims a merge from a non-existentpath@REV1-REV2.

    * r30820
    Fix pool issue which definitely can lead to assertion failures in
    reintegrate, and quite possibly to other mergeinfo corruption.

    * r30868, r30871
    In svnserve, tolerate unreadable passwd files. Don't error over
    svn ssh:// when the user can't read passwd.

    * r30843
    Fix abort in ra_serf when server sends invalid xml during replay.

    * r30907
    Fix for issue 3185. Fix the 'log --limit' compatability code in
    ra_svn, ra_serf, and ra_neon to ignore nested logs when in '-g' mode.

    * r30883, r30888
    Fix issue 3187. Fix reverse merges where merge target or subtree has
    non-inheritable revision ranges intersecting with the merged range.

    * r30931
    Remove 'blind deletion of argument to mkdir --parents', delete only
    if this invocation has created it.

    * r30896, r30905
    Make Cyrus SASL client support DIGEST-MD5.

    * r30986
    Fix potential segfault in svn_io_remove_dir2(path='.').

    * r29191, r29398, r29833, r30663, r30963, r30964
    Improve the responsiveness and accuracy of 'svn log -g'. [Less]

    Subversion 1.5 RC5
    Banjo trade-o

    Remember that awesome folding travel banjo I bought a year ago? It was
    really cool, but I traded it away for something better.

    My original itch was the fact that I was flying to California (and other
    places) at least five times per ... [More] year, and wanted to be able to join in
    jams in other cities. It’s really nervewracking to carry a banjo on a
    plane — usually the attendants will let you store it in the coat-hanging
    closet, but you live in constant fear of being forced to “gate check” the
    thing into the bottom of the plane. And that means burly men throwing the
    thing around. You can fill your hardshell case with bubble wrap all you
    want, but there are still a lot of horror stories out there. So the
    Tranjo was perfect: the neck just popped off (with strings still
    attached!), and the whole thing fit in a backpack. I went through airport
    security five times last year before anyone even noticed I had a banjo in
    my bag — it only got searched on the 6th flight. Great peace of mind!

    Unfortunately, the Tranjo had one big drawback: it was too quiet. I’d
    take it to jams and couldn’t even hear myself playing. The instrument was
    great for practicing quietly in hotel rooms, or playing solo around a
    campfire (which I did once)… but that’s it. No group jamming. So, I
    stopped carrying it with me on trips, and discovered it was easier to
    just ask friends to lend me banjos on the other side. Turns out there are
    several Googlers in Mountain View who have banjos I can borrow. :-)

    Thus, I decided to trade in my Tranjo for a really nice “traditional”
    open-back banjo. It’s a beautiful, light-weight thing, with a rock maple
    rim and mahogany neck. It sounds great, and is perfect for old-time
    “clawhammer” frailing. (Clawhammer is a whole different school of
    banjo-playing that doesn’t involve picks at all—the music pre-dates
    bluegrass by centuries, long before the bluegrass-heads added resonators
    to make banjos louder.) The banjo is made by a single artisan in
    Michigan, Bart Reiter. So now I have my big-ass resonator banjo for
    bluegrass jams, and my smaller (less expensive) open-back banjo for
    camping, car trips, and practicing at my office. It’s a joy to play!

    (Pictures below are taken from Turtle Hill Banjo’s website.)

    [IMAGE]
    [IMAGE] [Less]

Read all Subversion articles…


Who uses Subversion?

Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32 Anon32

Where in the world?



Related Projects by Tags

AnkhSVN, SCPlugin, SVK, TkCVS, TortoiseSVN



Project Cost

This calculator estimates how much it would cost to hire a team to write this project from scratch. More »
Include
Codebase 357,899
Effort (est.) 94 Person Years
Avg. Salary $ year
$ 5,175,808